Insights: Publications IP Litigation: New Options for Rights Holders and Strategy Changes for Defendants
Corporate Disputes Magazine
These shifts are expected to reshape the landscape for IP rights holders, accused infringers and litigation strategies in 2026 and beyond, as well as increase the amount of patent litigation. Key developments include expanded access to the US International Trade Commission (ITC), new European avenues for enforcing US patents and substantial restrictions on the use of inter partes reviews (IPRs) as a defence mechanism.
The Supreme Court decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo has the potential to be the most impactful decision on IP in decades. By vacating courts’ Chevron deference to administrative agencies’ interpretation of statutes, it made it substantially easier to overturn agency decisions, such as decisions by the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to reject patent applications, by the PTO’s Patent and Trademark Appeals Board (PTAB) to invalidate patents or by the US International Trade Commission (ITC) to enforce patents and trademarks.
While the most immediate impacts may be increases in litigation and appeals generally, the long-term impacts in terms of reversal of longstanding agency practices or bodies of law will be the most significant.
Indeed, its impact has already been demonstrated with respect to the ITC. The ITC is one of the most popular, effective forums for IP rights enforcement due to factors such as its speed, the availability of injunctive relief and its ability to stop the importation of knockoffs.
Related People
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
